AMroadmap.com
Data v0.4.2-fixes-deployed · 2026-05-17T20:40:00.000000
issue · 2026.q2
← Home
T0Methodology

How we build this dataset

AMRoadmap is a living research dataset, not a one-time report. Here is how data is sourced, structured, scored, and kept current.

Primary sources
  • 01Wohlers Report — Annual industry benchmark on AM market size, shipments, and technology status. Treated as a strong benchmark for market size figures where public data is available.
  • 02America Makes AM Technology Roadmap — Defines critical industry challenges and technical priority areas for US AM adoption. Key reference for TRL assessments and maturity timelines.
  • 03ASTM International AM Standards — F42 Committee publications and ratified standards (F3001, F3055, F3049, etc.) used for qualification and materials data.
  • 04ISO/ASTM 52900 series — International AM terminology and process classification standards. Referenced for process family definitions.
  • 05DOD Additive Manufacturing Strategy — US Department of Defense AM roadmap and sustainment guidance. Key reference for defense adoption signals and readiness levels.
  • 06OEM and machine manufacturer documentation — Technical process data from EOS, GE Additive, Stratasys, 3D Systems, HP, Desktop Metal, and others. Treated as primary for process capability data.
  • 07Peer-reviewed research — Published literature via Google Scholar and institutional repositories. Used for materials properties, qualification research, and failure mode data.
  • 08National lab publications — Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), NIST, AFRL, and similar institutions. Strong source for process data and qualification research.
Secondary sources
  • S1Industry press: Metal AM Magazine, TCT Magazine, Additive Manufacturing Magazine, 3DPrint.com
  • S2Company announcements, press releases, and investor filings (10-K, earnings calls)
  • S3Conference proceedings: RAPID+TCT, formnext, AMUG, IDAM, AIAA SciTech
  • S4Market research summaries (IDC, MarketsandMarkets, Mordor Intelligence — treated with lower weight due to methodology opacity)
  • S5Expert commentary on X/social — used as early signals, corroborated before inclusion
02Confidence scoring
High (75–90%)

Multiple independent sources agree. At least one is a standards body, government publication, or major industry benchmark (e.g., Wohlers). Claim is specific and falsifiable.

Medium (50–74%)

Two or more credible sources, or one strong source with supporting secondary evidence. Some uncertainty remains due to scope, timing, or methodology differences.

Low (25–49%)

Single source, or consensus is weak. Often applies to forecasts beyond 2030, emerging technologies with limited data, or claims based primarily on vendor assertions.

Confidence scores are editorial judgments, not statistical outputs. They reflect source quality, consensus breadth, and claim specificity. Identical scores across entries reflect similar source conditions, not algorithmic rounding.

03Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)

AMRoadmap uses the NASA/DOD TRL scale (1–9) adapted for manufacturing processes. TRL assignments draw on published qualifications, production adoption data, and America Makes roadmap guidance.

TRL 1–3Research / Proof of conceptBasic principles observed; lab demonstrations only
TRL 4–5Technology developmentValidated in lab or relevant environment; limited material/parameter sets
TRL 6–7System demonstrationPrototype demonstrated in relevant environment; limited qualification data
TRL 8Qualification completeSystem complete and qualified; initial production deployments
TRL 9Production-provenDeployed at scale in production; sustained supply chain
04Update cadence
How this dataset stays current
  • WWeekly intelligence scans — X/social monitoring for AM announcements, company news, standards updates, and conference signals. High-signal items are corroborated and queued for dataset updates.
  • MMonthly coverage audit — Identifies thin pages, stale forecasts, missing technologies, and emerging topics with growing search or social momentum.
  • QQuarterly deep updates — Full refresh of market forecasts, TRL assessments, and player profiles. Triggered by major reports (Wohlers annual, quarterly earnings, major standards publications).
05Caveats and limitations
01

Market size figures vary significantly by methodology. Wohlers-style estimates (hardware + materials + services) differ from consulting-house figures that include software or downstream parts value. We note the scope where known.

02

Projection confidence drops sharply beyond 2030. Scores below 60% on future timeline items reflect genuine uncertainty, not data gaps.

03

Vendor-supplied data is included but labeled. OEM capability claims are treated as upper bounds unless corroborated by independent testing or production case studies.

04

This dataset is not a substitute for primary due diligence. For investment, procurement, or qualification decisions, consult primary sources, standards bodies, and qualified engineers.

06Key authoritative sources
01
Wohlers Report (Annual)
Wohlers Associates
02
03
04
05
06
DOD Additive Manufacturing Strategy
US Department of Defense
07
08